Sun 29 Jan 2006
A recent comment on Peace order and Good Government got me to thinking on ambassadors, elections and so forth. Although I do not have a link for you yet on this rumor, Preston Manning, the patriarch of reform style conservatism in Canada, may be appointed as ambassador of Canada to the USA. The afore mentioned quote:
Och, weel: given the ambassadors that the Americans send us, I suppose Preston is more than a fair trade.
It is as clear to me as it is to Frank McKenna that Canada needs a new man in Mordor. This Liberal big whig is in the running (perhaps) to be the next Lib chief. Who then?
Oh I know! Preston Manning! I can see this working, really I can, With the Tories in Ottawa and the #$@@%&%*)! in Washington, a plaid shirt wearin’, cattle brandin’, true believin Albertexian just might fit the bill. I can see the logic but still, this is not my choice. I dissagree with him on most things but Preston is scholarly and thoughtful, faithful and clean living. Still he is not the man for the job.
In a way, I feel that an ambassador should not just be a representative for a people but a representative of a people. Canada’s ambassador in Washington should be polite but have a ’smug self satisfaction’ that we Canadians often have when dealing with our southern neighbours. He needs to be well versed in the politics in the world and their root causes. She needs to care deeply for the rights of people oppressed and suffering.
It is because of these two last points that our ambassador in Washington, to be a true representative of the Canadian people, must harbour a deep and righteous hatred of the American political establishment, all of their entrenched values and presuppositions and an opponent of almost all they are trying to accomplish in the world today. I propose a different ambassador. One whose views are clearly more those of Canadians writ large. I propose Svend Robinson for ambassador to the US.
He could bring his husband and Marc Emery could be their press secretary. They would bring cocoa and give speeches with the parents of the war dead protesting against the war. The whole thing is prodigiously Canadian. Any MP that got beat up by the Israeli military gets my vote, for ambassador or otherwise.
Really though, the Grand Ambassadorship should be one of the posts of merit and of good fit. Ohh. Imagine Conrad Black. Hey buddy, here is yer get-out-of-jail-with-diplomatic-immunity-free card. Thanks for all of the good press and the consolidation of the national media etc. More seriously though, I could see David Frum for example or former Tory PM Kim Campbell. Campbell was a consul general for California in recent years. This post would perhaps be a reasonable promotion.
Keep the ideologues out. It only encourages them.

David Frum would be a good choice - he speaks their language but is one of us (the best part is, they think he’s one of them).
But Svend, ah, Svend would be a marvellous choice! Oh the diplomatic irony of it! Half the country would hate what he is, and the other half would hate what he stands for! The best part would be watching the political machinations as they try to find a way to veto his appointment. What would they say, “You can’t be the ambassador because you are too gay?” Because he has a political conscience?
It’s Brilliant!
Who cares about Svend’s sexual orientation? To each their own. This should not be the issue by which we select ambasadors.
Issues aside, are you trully sugesting we send a confessed theif to represent us to our largest enconomic partner? Should we send convicts to represent us on the international scene? I think not. Maybe another choice.
By the way, why the heavy tilt on “Us vs. Them”? Not currently a fan I assume….
John, I’m just saying your guy Harper is gonna have his troubles with this administration too. Seems to be a theme to expect good relations with a new PM and have them turn sour before the milk’s even out of the fridge. As for Svend, he has proven himself capable, but I am not truly serious about the pick. His grave error took less than 10 seconds and many Conservative politicians in Canada can’t stand in front of a microphone for that length of time without threatening the liberty of a segment of this country’s population.
You’re right, I can get a little saddle sore riding this big elephant, but if their ambassadors keep their mouths shut for long enough I might be more tolerant.
But I’m on the other side of the fence this time, John. And you’re the Right one.
oooohhhhh…. will.
We are all joking about svend, right? I was watching TV the other night and an american president was saying “we do not appoint theives to be ambassadors!” Life imitating art? Art imitating life?
I have an even better suggestion for ambassador to the US: Monty Solberg!! He’s funny! And think how great the soundbytes would be! the one stipulation is that he has to keep writing his blog himself.
Rich guys, so Rich…and I love it.
I was saddened to hear yesterday that Sarah had in fact voted Lib..Lib…Lib..no I cant say it but I think you know. And in Calgary too.
Listen Will, email me your plans for the 17-18 in Calgary. I’ll be out there from the 15th to 21st and would love to meet Briana and have a drink with you. Let me know. I’ll be mostly around Edmonton for work meetings but have scheduled in several days for family.
Monty Solburg, hmmmmmmmmm…….
[…] 29th January 2006 Hey Presto! […]